Prophet Muhammad who is famously difficult to know something for certain about a world religion’s creator Prophet Muhammad. One doctrine after another reshapes him as a figure for veneration and imitation for a large number of people in times and places he never knew, just as one shrine after another obliterates the contours of the localities in which he was involved.
There isn’t a scrap of proof to support this. Some contend that the Prophet (salallahu ‘alayhi wasallam) did not reveal anything to the general Muslim community. He reportedly disclosed some details to only his family members. That’s one of the reasons why some people worship ‘Ali (radhiyallaahu ‘anhu) more than he should, while others use it to inspire people to worship mashaaikh (plural of Sheikh). So they say, “You will never get the full revelation from Allaah unless you come to our Sheikh, no matter how long you research Islaam.” He is aware of the concealed revelation.” From there, they enslave people spiritually.
In the case of Mohammed, Muslim literary sources for his life do not begin until around 750-800 CE (common era), four to five generations after his death, and few Islamicists (specialists in the history and study of Islam) today believe they are reliable historical accounts. Despite this, we probably know more about Mohammed than we do about Jesus (let alone Moses or the Buddha), and we have a lot more ability to learn.
Despite occasional attempts to refute it, there is no denying that Mohammed existed. Within two years of his death, his Byzantine Syria neighbors had heard of him; a Greek text written between 632 and 634 during the Arab invasion of Syria mentions that “a false prophet has appeared among the Saracens”. Dismisses him as an impostor on the grounds that prophets do not come “with sword and chariot.” It gives the impression that he was in charge of the invasions.
Apart from the fact that this claim contradicts the Qur’aan and ahadeeth. It is the person who claims something in the religion who is responsible for providing evidence, not the person who says it isn’t. This will save you a lot of trouble if you remember it. Before you believe something in your Creed or begin an act of worship, you must have evidence.
Prophet Muhammad’s death is generally dated to 632, but it’s hard to rule out the possibility that it occurred two or three years later. The Muslim calendar was founded after Mohammed’s death, with his emigration (hijra) to Medina (then Yathrib) ten years earlier as the starting point. However, some Muslims seem to have attributed this point of origin to the year 624-5 in the Gregorian calendar, rather than the canonical year of 622.
Last but not least:
Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman narrated:
If this updated date is correct, the evidence from the Greek text suggests that Mohammed is the only world religion’s founder who is attested in a contemporary source. In any case, this source offers fairly good proof that he was a historical figure. Furthermore, an Armenian text dating from around 661 mentions him by name and provides a thorough account of his monotheist preaching.
Patricia Crone is an Islamic history professor at Princeton’s Institute for Advanced Research. Meccan Trade and the Emergence of Islam (Princeton University Press, 1987 [reprinted 2004]); “How did the Quranic Pagans Make a Living?” (Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies (68 / 2005); and “Quraysh and the Roman Army: Making Sense of the Qurashi Leathertrade” (Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies (68 / 2005). (Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, forthcoming [spring 2007]).
People used to ask Allah’s Messenger (a.s.) about the positive, but I used to ask him about the poor in order to avoid being overtaken by them. “O Allah’s Messenger ( )!” I exclaimed. We were living in ignorance and in the worst possible world when Allah sent us this good (Islam); will there be any evil after this good?” “Yes,” he responded. ‘Will there be any good after that evil?’ I wondered. ‘Yeah, but it will be corrupted (not pure.)’ he responded. “What would be its taint?” I inquired. “(There will be) some people who will lead others contrary to my tradition?” he replied. You’ll agree with some of their acts and disagree with others..”
“Will there be any bad after that good?” I wondered. “Yes, some people will be calling at the gates of the (Hell) Fire, and whoever responds to their call will be thrown into the (Hell) Fire,” he responded. “O Allah’s Apostle!” I exclaimed. “Will you tell us about them?” “We will be from our own people and speak our language,” he said. “Stick to the community of Muslims and their Imam (ruler),” he said when I asked, “What do you order me to do if such a state should occur in my life?” “What if there isn’t a Muslim community or an Imam (ruler)?” I asked. “, he explained.”Then, even if you had to bite (eat) the roots of a tree before death overtook you while you were in that state, turn away from all those sects.”
7084 in the Sahih al-Bukhari.
Book 92, Hadith 35 is the in-book guide.
Vol. 9, Book 88, Hadith 206, USC-MSA web (English) reference
Story of Prophet Muhammad
Patricia Crone’s most recent book is Medieval Islamic Political Thought (Edinburgh University Press, 2004; Columbia University Press, 2004).
On the Islamic side, sources dating from the mid-eighth century preserve a document drawn up between Mohammed and the inhabitants of Yathrib, which there are good reasons to accept as broadly authentic; Prophet Muhammad is also mentioned by name four times in the Qur’an and identified as a messenger of God.
Real, Mohammed only appears on Arabic coins and inscriptions, as well as papyri and other historical evidence in the language, in the 680s, some fifty years after his death (whatever its exact date). Some, like Yehuda D Nevo and Judith Koren, have challenged his life on this basis. Few people, however, would support the suggestion that history must be reconstructed solely on the basis of documentary evidence. The proof that a prophet was involved among the Arabs in the early 7th century, on the eve of the Arab invasion of the Middle East, is extraordinary.
All else about Mohammed is a little hazier, but we can still tell a lot with absolute certainty. Above all, we can be fairly assured that the Qur’an is a set of utterances made in the belief that they were revealed to him by God. The book does not contain any of the messages he claims to have sent, and he is not responsible for how we have them arranged. They were gathered after his death, though how long after is debatable Prophet Muhammad. But it’s impossible to deny that he said all or most of them.Of course, those who refute the presence of an Arabian prophet challenge it, but it poses too many problems with later proof, and even the Qur’an itself, for the attempt to be compelling.